In an age when personal data is the oil of the future, India is at a crossroads at which its journey for data protection has now reached new heights. With more than 750 million internet users and a growing digital economy booming, it’s never been easier to ignore Data Privacy Laws in India. India’s approach to data protection has evolved considerably over the past two decades, particularly in the public sphere. And with the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP Act) in 2023, India was a new landmark for data protection that had moved beyond its past 20 years of regulation. Data privacy laws are essential in many areas, not just to the regulatory aspects, but also for compliance. The Data Privacy Laws in India rewire how organizations collect, process, and store personal information and enable them to gather and store it as a means for powerless users to gain unprecedented insight into their own digital footprints. Understanding India is crucial when it comes to digital development: its policy of “Data” privacy is paramount, and businesses and policymakers will have to adopt an understanding of its data protection regime and its rules.
Data privacy, otherwise referred to as information privacy, is defined as a fundamental human right in which people determine the manner and content of all the activities of any organization that uses, processes, or stores their private information. It includes transparency, purpose limitation, data minimization, and accountability in the use and distribution of data.
Personal information is any data that can uniquely identify a person, however much it may not be used to provide them with identification (e.g., names, email addresses, phone numbers), financial information, biometrics, or even IP numbers, such that they may make a critical contribution. In the Indian scenario, due to the country’s digitalisation initiatives, adoption of digital payment systems, and the growth of social media, among others, the significance of data privacy in India has now been enhanced.
Data privacy is inextricably tied to the fundamental right to privacy; that is, protection against unauthorized surveillance of individuals, confidentiality of all personal information, and ensuring that data collection is for legitimate purposes. A good data privacy law creates a balance between human rights and innovation in a digital economy.
Data Privacy Laws in India started with the introduction of the Information Technology Act, 2000, which was the first piece of legislation for digital technology in the country. It brought in Section 43A, which established that companies are liable upon breach of reasonable security practices and procedures, which, if the harm is a consequence, may cause wrongful loss or gain to anyone. Section 72A criminalised information disclosure without consent. But these were very narrow and, in nature, were mainly concerned with data security and not necessarily extensive privacy control. The Act was dominated by special regulations in various regulatory areas where regulators worked in close collaboration, resulting in a fragmented regulatory environment. The RBI issued guidance for banks’ operations, and the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) dealt with telecom-related data concerns.
The Supreme Court’s historic breakthrough in India’s privacy jurisprudence was the unanimous decision of Justice K.S. Puttaswamy at the Union of India. The nine-judge bench interpreted privacy as a fundamental right in Article 21 of the Constitution, enshrining Data Privacy Laws in India as an inalienable natural right that belongs to all people. The judgment established the groundwork for data protection that any infringement of privacy must serve a legitimate state interest, be proportional to need, and have sufficient procedural safeguards. This decision provided a fundamental constitutional basis for a comprehensive data protection law and could profoundly shape future decisions in this area.
After the Puttaswamy judgment, the Government established the Justice B.N. Srikrishna Committee to draft a comprehensive data protection law in 2018. With the committee’s report in 2018, the Personal Data Protection Bill had several drafts and was also subject to extensive public consultations. The draft bills outlined a broad framework similar to the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) that involved data localization, consent mechanisms, individual rights, and penalties. However, there was concern that exemptions from the government, the need to localize data, and the expansive powers given to the Data Protection Authority in some cases forced this subject, and discussions kept going on.
Parliament finally passed the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, after years of dialogue, with the approval of Parliament’s Cabinet members and the President in August 202,3, after they signed off on that act. The DPDPA is a departure from earlier drafts of the Act and brings a cleaner, business-oriented approach without losing individual privacy rights. It covers processing of ‘digital personal data’ within the territory of India and processing of personal data to the extent that it is relevant to the provision of goods or services to persons within India. It defines a consensual framework whereby there are rights for data principals and obligations for data fiduciaries.
As we move through 2025, organizations are looking towards taking the DPDPA into full effect. The government has been developing detailed procedures to implement the provisions of the Act. Their specifications are to do with consent mechanisms, notice about data breaches, and how to achieve compliance. Moreover, precise line-drawing and formal drafting are necessary. This is a new period for businesses to align their practices with the latest legal requirements.
Even though the DPDP Act superseded the vast majority of data protection issues, the IT Act applies to some data protection and cyber crimes. In the same vein, while Section 43A maintains liability for compensation for breaches by corporate bodies of reasonable security, Section 72A applies to data breaches by unauthorized disclosure by corporations in the course of lawful contracts. Such provisions served as the cornerstone that organizations handling personal information need to have the correct technical and organizational frameworks for safeguarding such information. The Act also introduced the notion of “reasonable security practices and procedures,” which should be implemented to avoid liability.
The DPDP Act is the main data protection law that governs the processing of personal data in India. The Act also defines key concepts such as “personal data” (data about an individual who can be identified), “data fiduciary” (entity determining the purpose and means of processing), and “data principal” (the individual to whom personal data relates). The Act provides for lawful grounds for the processing of personal data, with consent forming the most important provision for almost all processing activity. It also sets out specific exemptions, including processing for legitimate uses, legal obligations, and other government functions. Both automated processing and non-automated processing of personal data shall be addressed under the Act, which would cover any data processing and processing activities.
Some key areas of the DPDP Act include simplified mechanisms of consent, the recognition of deemed consent in specific situations, provisions for cross-border data transfers, and the formation of a Data Protection Board with robust enforcement powers. The Act also makes provision for the “significant data fiduciaries,” who are under additional pressure because of the massive volume of data and the sensitivity of data processing. It is to initiate a free compliance assessment and act to ensure proper data protection compliance.
Personal information protection rights – the fundamental right of consumers to seek validation on their personal information from their data fiduciaries. It also provides the possibility of a summary for the processing of personal data, the types of personal data, the means by which it is being treated, and also of information as to the identity (or types of personal data fiduciary) or information with which personal data has been disclosed. The right to access helps individuals to feel empowered in determining the extent and nature of data processing that concerns them.
Data fiduciaries are required to respond to access requests within reasonable timeframes and provide relevant information in clear or understandable formats. This accountability aspect of this transparency obligation is an essential one.
This has also been the right to have personal data that is inaccurate corrected and data that is incomplete completed. The erasure right applies when personal data is no longer necessary for the actual purpose, consent has been withdrawn, or data has been processed illegally. Nevertheless, the right to erasure contains inherent limitations, especially when current processing is necessary in relation to legal obligations, for carrying out public functions, or for the initiation, application, or defense of legal claims. Data fiduciaries must also introduce mechanisms and procedures within their systems to ensure these rights are adequately exercised.
People have the right to have their rights of data protection violated and the right to effective grievance redressal mechanisms. The DPDP Act mandates that data fiduciaries have guidelines for conducting internal grievances, establish grievance procedures within a complaint, and appoint data protection officers to hear complaints and inquiries. The Act further creates the Data Protection Board, which can investigate complaints, conduct inquiries, and issue sanctions for infractions. Its multi-layered approach guarantees that people have access to internal mechanisms of the company and outside regulatory oversight for solving data protection issues.
Under the DPDP Act, one of the most crucial rights is to withdraw consent if processing data is sought. Users have the autonomy to withdraw consent at any point and do so as easily as giving consent. Data fiduciaries are required to stop processing personal data after the users withdraw their consent, though they may be asked to process data on an alternative lawful basis. The Act also establishes a principle of deemed consent, under which, in certain conditions, processing must be allowed, for example, for employment or in case of health emergencies or compliance with statutory obligations. But even with a “deemed consent,” someone still has some rights regarding their own data.
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has given banks clear guidelines on the collection, storage, and processing of consumer data. Such advice is augmented by the DPDP Act, as it offers sector-specific requirements for financial institutions. Under the RBI’s Guidance on ‘Storage of Payment System Data,’ payment system operators must make sure that all data regarding payments is stored only in India. Moreover, as the central bank further establishes, the rules on customer data protection call for explicit consent, minimizing the data, and strong security. The financial institution’s data governance and regular audit processes also need to be in place to have proper, robust governance over data usage and audit systems.
The telecom sector has particular provisions in the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, which includes the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services Interconnection (Addressable Systems) Regulations and recommendations for the security of customer data confidentiality. These regulations focus on issues like customer consent for data sharing, location data privacy, and protection against unsolicited communications. TRAI’s regulations also cover aspects like customer verification processes, data retention periods, and the sharing of customer information with third parties. The authority has been particularly active in addressing issues related to spam calls and messages, implementing measures to protect consumer privacy in telecommunications.
According to them, insurance data protection, privacy of customer data, privacy in insurance transactions, risk in insurance transactions, and digital customer onboarding methods will be addressed by these guidelines. This paper, in particular, is designed to focus on the unique difficulties of insurance data storage in dealing with insurance (medical records, claims data, records for medical information, records of medical claims, etc. This includes medical, claims, and insurance information. IRDAI regulations also call through its regulations stressed the importance of gaining informed consent to collect insurance data, data transmission protocols with confidentiality for secure data collection, securing systems for the transmission of sensitive information, and safeguarding certain kinds of health data. The authority also expects insurance companies to put together strict mechanisms for using databases, customer grievance redressal, and data governance.
India does not have a direct equivalent to the US Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Still, the healthcare sector operates under various guidelines from the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, medical councils, and provisions of the DPDP Act for sensitive personal information. The Clinical Establishments Act, as well as several other State-level regulations for healthcare authorities, also place data protection obligations on healthcare providers. The Digital Health Mission and National Digital Health Blueprint have created new obligations on health data security, such as data portability requirements, consent, and a harmonization approach to security standards on health information systems. These tools are intended to strike a balance between innovative digital health and strong Data Privacy Laws in India.
The GDPR has had a significant impact on international data protection law, such as the DPDP Act adopted by India. Both legislations put a strong focus on processing rights, individual rights, responsibility, and regulation for data controllers and processors that require users to consent and are committed to accountability. But the GDPR and DPDP Act are different. The GDPR also includes six legal bases for processing; in contrast, the DPDP Act mostly depends on informed consent, except for some exceptions. The GDPR is a territorial system (to the extent that it covers any processing of EU residents), while the DPDP Act is one that allows processing only in India or limits the processing of Indian users. The penalties imposed under GDPR can also range up to 4% of global annual turnover, while the DPDP Act is based on very specific penalty maximums of INR 250 crores.
Unlike the DPDP Act, California’s Consumer Privacy Act emphasizes consumer rights and business transparency. The CCPA gives consumers the rights to know, delete, opt-out, and non-discrimination and sets specific obligations for businesses engaged in processing California residents’ personal information. The CCPA applies to companies that exceed certain revenue or volume business thresholds, while the DPDP Act is more general. The CCPA also provides for certain things, namely, the sale of personal information and opt-out rights, which are handled differently under Indian law than within the CCPA.
Standard features that exist in these Data Privacy Laws in India are granting the individual rights to personal data; mandatory transparency in sharing personal information; demands for protecting data; and the creation of regulatory enforcement mechanisms. Also, all three consider cross-border data sharing and use different methods to provide sufficient protection. Differences are in the legal bases for processing, penalty systems, territorial application, and rights extended to individuals.
This new legislative framework is the result of the national characterization of the Data Privacy Laws in India that are under investigation and will be reflected in its interpretation, as well as by the legislative framework that was created to protect the rights of Data Privacy Laws in India; this is a process to be adapted to all sectors in the country, including the government and individuals concerned. Complex, still-undertaken implementation has detailed rules that need further work on the law’s enforcement tools, penalty calculation methods, and due dates for compliance. The nature of the uncertainty about regulation poses obstacles to businesses interested in adopting data protection-compliant programs and can result in a lack of consistency in application.
India’s evolving digital economy is also confronting a multi-faceted dilemma of privacy vs. innovation that it must resolve with regard to the protection of the private sector, which is on the rise. The DPDP Act does provide specific exemptions for government processing and national security; the extent to which these exemptions are applied, and how they have been used to date, is a matter of contention. Continued tradeoffs between localization and cross-border data flows, along with international business operations, are perennial problems for multinationals and Indian businesses doing cross-national operations. Policy implementation of privacy rules is key to preserving Data Privacy Laws in India, as well as national security, while preventing stifling technological innovation and economic growth, and ensuring that there is a “reasonable risk” that these regulations will not be ignored.
One particularly contentious area in India has been government access to personal data in national security, law enforcement, and public order issues. The DPDP Act sets many general exemptions for the processing of government data, which concerns potential overreach and the absence of monitoring mechanisms. Critics say the exemptions are too broad and do not include strong procedural protections, and supporters say that they form the basis of such provisions for legitimate government functioning. Finding the proper balance between security requirements and protection of Data Privacy Laws in India is an ever-evolving problem that necessitates active stakeholder engagement.
Several key trends and developments will shape the future of data privacy in India. The implementation of detailed rules under the DPDP Act will provide clarity on operational aspects and compliance requirements. The establishment and functioning of the Data Protection Board will determine the practical enforcement of privacy rights and business obligations.
Technological developments such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, and the Internet of Things will continue to challenge existing privacy frameworks, requiring adaptive regulatory approaches. The integration of privacy-by-design principles into system architecture and business processes will become increasingly crucial for sustainable compliance.
India’s approach to international data governance, including participation in cross-border frameworks and bilateral agreements, will influence its data protection ecosystem. The country’s growing role in global technology standards and privacy frameworks will also shape future policy directions.
The evolution of judicial interpretation of privacy rights, particularly in relation to emerging technologies and new forms of data processing, will provide necessary guidance for privacy law development. Public awareness and digital literacy initiatives will play crucial roles in empowering individuals to exercise their privacy rights effectively.
As organizations navigate India’s evolving data privacy landscape, comprehensive compliance solutions become essential for the effective implementation of privacy requirements. KYC Hub provides integrated compliance tools designed specifically for the Indian regulatory environment, offering automated privacy assessment capabilities, consent management systems, and ongoing compliance monitoring.
The platform addresses the unique challenges of Indian data protection law by providing sector-specific compliance templates, automated data mapping and inventory tools, and integrated breach response capabilities. KYC Hub’s solution includes real-time regulatory updates, ensuring that organizations stay current with evolving requirements and enforcement guidance.
Through its comprehensive approach to privacy compliance, KYC Hub enables organizations to implement robust data protection programs while maintaining operational efficiency and business growth objectives. The platform’s integration capabilities ensure seamless incorporation of privacy controls into existing business processes and technology infrastructure.
The success of India’s data protection framework will depend on the practical implementation of the DPDP Act, the development of clear operational guidelines, and the establishment of robust enforcement mechanisms. Organizations must proactively address compliance requirements, implement privacy-by-design principles, and establish comprehensive data governance frameworks. Those seeking guidance on implementing these frameworks can explore our detailed resources on building effective compliance programs.
As India continues to develop its position as a global technology leader, the effectiveness of its Data Privacy Laws will serve as a crucial factor in building trust with both domestic and international stakeholders. The ongoing evolution of privacy law, driven by technological advancement and changing social expectations, will require continuous adaptation and refinement of regulatory approaches, making continuous compliance monitoring essential for organizations.
The journey toward comprehensive data protection in India has reached a critical milestone with the DPDP Act. Still, the real test lies in its practical implementation and the development of a privacy-conscious digital culture. Success in this endeavor will position India as a leader in balancing innovation with privacy protection, setting an example for other developing economies navigating similar challenges.
India’s data privacy landscape represents a significant evolution from fragmented, sector-specific guidelines to a comprehensive national framework under the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. This transformation reflects the country’s commitment to protecting individual privacy rights while supporting its digital economy ambitions.
Ready to ensure your organization’s data privacy compliance in India? Don’t let regulatory complexity hold your business back. KYC Hub’s comprehensive data protection solutions are designed specifically for the Indian market, helping organizations navigate DPDP Act requirements while maintaining operational efficiency.
Book a free demo with us!
Frequently Asked Questions
The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (DPDP Act), is India’s primary data privacy law. It was enacted in August 2023 and establishes comprehensive rules for processing personal data, individual rights, and organizational obligations. The Act is complemented by sector-specific regulations from authorities like RBI, TRAI, and IRDAI.
Under the DPDP Act, penalties can reach up to INR 250 crores depending on the nature and severity of the violation. The Act establishes different penalty categories for various violations, including failure to implement security safeguards, non-compliance with individual rights, and unauthorized data processing. The Data Protection Board has discretion in determining appropriate penalty amounts.
While the DPDP Act shares some similarities with GDPR, including emphasis on individual rights and consent-based processing, there are significant differences. The DPDP Act has a more streamlined approach, focuses primarily on consent as the legal basis for processing, and includes specific provisions for deemed consent. The territorial scope, penalty structure, and enforcement mechanisms also differ from GDPR.
The DPDP Act applies to all entities processing digital personal data within India’s territory and to entities outside India that process personal data in connection with offering goods or services to individuals in India. This includes businesses of all sizes, government entities (with specific exemptions), and non-profit organisations that handle personal data.
Individuals can protect their data by understanding their rights under the DPDP Act, including rights to access, correction, erasure, and grievance redressal. They should read privacy policies carefully, provide consent judiciously, regularly review and update privacy settings on digital platforms, and report violations to relevant authorities or data protection officers. Staying informed about data protection best practices and exercising available rights proactively are essential for adequate personal data protection.
Don’t navigate the complex requirements of the DPDP Act alone. KYCHub’s comprehensive data protection solutions are specifically designed for the Indian regulatory landscape, helping organizations achieve compliance while maintaining operational efficiency.
