The prehistoric money transfer method, Hawala, functions beyond formal banking networks because it depends on trust and gets abused for money laundering purposes. The hawala system significantly challenges compliance standards because it disrupts anti-money laundering requirements. The paper analyzes Hawala’s money transfer operations by examining its framework design and security weaknesses so investigators can develop complete solutions for preventing illicit Hawala activity.
Hawala money laundering is a process of transferring illicit funds through informal networks, bypassing legal banking systems. The United Nations estimates that $100-300 billion passes through hawala networks each year. It is quick, untraceable, and trust-based, making it ideal for illegal activities such as terrorism financing and tax evasion. In 2020, Indian police seized more than ₹1,000 crore for hawala activities. Despite crackdowns, hawala continues to thrive due to low fees and secrecy.
Hawala functions as a traditional money transfer system that uses brokers named hawaladars to execute transactions via an informal system of funds movement. This financial exchange framework depends on relationships built through trust among members with strong social bonds instead of traditional legal arrangements. Residents of South Asia, the Middle East, and African countries use hawala as a speedy money transfer system when their nations lack established banking frameworks.
Hawala money laundering involves using the informal network to transfer unidentified illegal funds between countries. Money launderers achieve their goals by concealing financial transactions using Hawala methods because Hawala operates outside formal banks, making tracking activities difficult for law enforcement to implement anti-money laundering regulations.
Criminals choose Hawala for money laundering because it provides anonymous operations with few recording requirements, fast transfers, and affordable fees. The difficulty of regulation stems from the fact that hawaladars don’t need KYC verification and keep few written documents, thus making the system hard to monitor. Hawala’s characteristics allow criminals to launder funds generated by drug trafficking, terrorism financing, tax evasion, and corrupt activities.
A transferor predominantly based in a country with rigid financial regulations approaches a hawaladar, furnishing them with information regarding the amount desired for transfer, details of the intended recipient, and a code or password.
The sender hands money to the local hawaladar, who records transaction details but is not usually particular about documentation.
The local hawaladar contacts a relevant counterpart in the recipient country, usually through phone, email, or encrypted apps, with details of the amount, code, and recipient particulars.
After verifying the code or identifier, the second hawaladar pays the amount agreed upon to the recipient. No money is said to cross borders in the usual sense; the transfer is based on absolute trust.
After a while, hawaladars will use various means to settle their dues, including trade-based money laundering, cash smuggling, or bank transfers disguised as legitimate business transactions.
It is complete when the recipient receives the funds within hours or, at most, a few days—far swifter than traditional banking methods.
Hawala networks operate globally, often serving communities where traditional banking is slow, expensive, or inaccessible. Here are real-world examples of how Hawala is used—both legally and illicitly:
Example: A construction worker might be in Dubai and want to send money to his family in Pakistan. Instead of a bank, which may charge him hefty fees and take days, he hands over cash to a local Hawala broker. The broker informs a partner in Pakistan, and the equivalent amount in rupees is delivered within hours, without any actual movement of money across borders.
Why Hawala?
Example: An Indian dealer who imports electronics from China is particularly concerned about currency controls. Instead of carrying out a wire transfer, he pays a Hawala broker in rupees. The broker finds a Chinese counterpart who pays the supplier in yuan.
Why Hawala?
Example: An NGO needs to deliver aid to Syria but faces banking sanctions. It uses a Hawala network to transfer funds to local partners, who distribute cash to refugees.
Why Hawala?
Example: A criminal group in Europe wants to move drug profits to the Middle East without detection. They use Hawala to break transactions into untraceable cash exchanges, leaving no digital trail.
Why Hawala?
Example: A businessman in India wants to hide income from the tax authorities. He “invests” cash with a Hawala broker, who returns it as untaxed foreign income via offshore shell companies.
Why Hawala?
Example: A Hawala broker accepts Bitcoin in Europe, converts it to cash via local exchanges, and pays out in fiat in Africa, skirting crypto regulations.
Why?
Hawala is an informal system for transferring and using money, but it has limited banking or very tight financial access. Although swift and convenient, it poses serious regulatory and security risks. There follows a comparative treatment of the advantages and disadvantages:
Speed & Efficiency
Low Cost
Accessibility
Anonymity & Privacy
Cultural Trust-Based System
No Legal Recourse
Money Laundering & Illicit Finance Risks
Regulatory Crackdowns
Exchange Rate & Settlement Risks
Undermines Formal Banking Systems
Hawala is both a blessing and a curse: it is excellent for quick and cheap remittances in areas of low financial service penetration and an avenue for illicit activities because of weak regulation. It addresses gaps within the global economic system, giving rise to unlawful conduct. The proposed regulated alternative would include using digital wallets or blockchain remittances as a safer avenue.
Hawala is part of cultural traditions and is often used for legitimate remittance. However, because of its informal nature, it faces many regulatory problems. Therefore, many governments and international bodies have evolved laws and frameworks to contain the misuse of such networks for illegal purposes, particularly money laundering and terrorist financing.
The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) generally directs the hawala international regulatory mechanism. It calls for the registration, supervision, and AML obligations of all money service businesses (MSBs) and informal value transfer systems like hawala. FATF also calls for international cooperation to tackle the cross-border nature of hawala networks.
In the USA, hawala-like operations are subject to the provisions of the Bank Secrecy Act, whereby hawaladars must be registered with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and must comply with the AML reporting requirements. In the case of the European Union, any payment service provider must adhere to its Anti-Money Laundering Directives (AMLD), which carry an obligation for due diligence and reporting.
In the Middle East, hawala is legal, but in most cases, it is under a licensing regime monitored by the Central Bank, particularly in the UAE. In South Asia, there would be a prohibition on unauthorized hawala transactions in India under the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), and these activities are considered criminal offenses when money laundering or terrorism is involved.
To comply with AML frameworks, hawaladars would have to maintain records of transactions, apply KYC procedures, and disclose suspicious transactions. However, many continue to operate underground due to incurring high costs of compliance and resistance from the cultural perspective of formalization, and so put enforcement at bay.
Some of the key obstacles to creating a sustainable regulatory environment for hawala include its informal and undocumented nature, lack of international coordination in enforcement, and the strong community trust that often provides cover for hawaladars. These factors impede regulatory intervention and thwart worldwide efforts to root out financial crime facilitated through these systems. For hawala to be effectively regulated, legal enforcement, international cooperation, and community involvement would be required to bring informal operators into the formal financial system.
There are many obstacles to law enforcement agencies when investigating hawala networks. One of the prime obstacles would be the absence of formal documentation. The transactions usually take place through oral understanding and a simple written record, leaving almost no audit trail behind, making it a hard task to trace the origin or destination of the funds.
It tends not to be recognized with the other country’s jurisdiction when, sometimes, hawala operations are conducted across borders, leading to jurisdiction issues and tangling the investigation and prosecution process of such illegitimate financial flows. Cultural and linguistic barriers are additional complicating factors for investigations, especially when hawaladars deeply penetrate closed communities that may resist cooperation with the authorities.
Legitimate businesses, such as hawala operations, are finding it difficult to comply with contemporary norms regarding regulation. Many do not have the infrastructure or knowledge to execute comprehensive KYC and AML procedures. The compliance costs are usually prohibitively high for small-scale operators in low-income areas. The variance in regulatory regimes adds more complexity in that what is lawful and regulated in a specific country may be marginalized in another. The scattered legal environment discourages the hawaladars from formalization; hence, the cycle of informality and risk is perpetuated.
Technology-based solutions in the form of KYC Hub are very much required to address this challenge. KYC hub provides a cutting-edge AML solution to identify suspicious financial behavior even in networks with minimal data. Its artificial intelligence-powered risk scoring, transaction monitoring, and sanctions screening help financial institutions and regulators spot red flags associated with hawala-like activities. KYC Hub automates KYC processes through integrated global compliance standards, thus empowering organizations to detect, investigate, and report possible violations more efficiently. These solutions, therefore, bring the gap between informal financial practices and modern regulations closer.
The informal, trust-based structure and operational opacity of hawala set it apart in its challenge to global AML enforcement. While this system is employed for legitimate purposes in many places, the potential for abuse by money launderers and criminals remains high. Effective regulation would require a caring dimension plus a robust compliance framework. KYC Hub tools can harness much of the modernisation against Hawala-based money laundering by closing the gap between tradition and technology.
People are also reading:
Explore our comprehensive guide on money laundering, its stages, impacts on the economy, and...
Read More
Explore the complexities of placement in money laundering with KYC Hub. Gain in-depth insights...
Read More
Explore our comprehensive guide on 'Layering in Money Laundering'. Understand its complexity, implications, prevention...
Read More
